Marine Corps Association - The Professional Association for All MarinesMarine Corps Gazette - Professional Journal of U.S. Marines
  • Marine Corps Association Home
  • Leatherneck Home
  • Online Store
  • Member Login
Marine Corps Gazette

In Store Now

The Lions of Iwo Jima: The Story of Combat Team 28 and the Bloodiest Battle of Marine Corps History
The Lions of Iwo Jima
By Fred Haynes & James A. Warren $26.00
(Member $23.40)
Buy Now

Advertising

Walden University

 

Homeland Defense and Combat Engineers

Valuable training along the U.S.-Mexico border

by 1stLt Patrick W. Junick


Fom 10 November to 23 December 2005, two task-organized platoons from 1st Combat Engineer Battalion (1st CEB) were involved in two engineer missions in support of Joint Task Force-North (JTF-N) and the U.S. Border Patrol (USBP). The scope of JTF-N’s mission along the southern borders of Arizona and New Mexico is to support the USBP’s interdiction of illegal drug traffic and illegal immigration along the U.S.-Mexico border. Additionally, it is to help secure the U.S. border during the ongoing global war on terrorism (GWOT). The two engineer missions were the construction of security lighting and a vehicular barrier fence along the U.S.-Mexico border.

The first mission was located near Naco, AZ, and the second was located in Columbus, NM. Due to continuous deployments in support of the GWOT, this evolution marked the first time in several years that 1st Marine Division (1st MarDiv) has been able to provide units to support JTF-N. In fact, during the execution of these missions, 1st CEB had one company (reinforced) in Iraq, one company (reinforced) conducting Operation IRAQI FREEDOM predeployment training, and two platoons assigned to/operating in support of the 13th and 15th Marine Expeditionary Units. Despite this high operational tempo, 1st CEB examined the feasibility of supporting this real-world training opportunity and realized the time was right to take advantage of this opportunity. Marines would have the chance for technical practice in their respective military occupational specialties (MOSs) while conducting the missions in an austere environment. Many of the Marines supporting these missions were getting close to their end of active service and could not deploy to Iraq, but they had much to offer prior to their release from active duty.

1st CEB’s two platoons were under the tactical control of JTF-N. Each was provided the tools and General Services Administration (GSA) vehicles from JTF-N. All heavy equipment was contracted through Hertz. The USBP was responsible for providing construction materials as well as force protection of the units working in support of their larger mission along the border. The USBP was required to be on site whenever Marines were on the border to prevent any encounter between Marines and anyone conducting illegal activity. In addition, each platoon had “guardian angels” (USBP agents) as a final precaution.

Billeting was a little different between the two sites. The Marines working in Naco were able to stay in a hotel in Bisbee, AZ, but had to commute about 30 minutes to their jobsite. In Columbus the Marines billeted in a bunkhouse provided by a local farmer at the request of the local USBP station. The bunkhouse was used for this mission as well as other similar missions in the area. These Marines were located roughly 4 miles from the border and the jobsite and 10 miles from the village of Columbus, the nearest town. Chow for both missions was contracted from local restaurants for both breakfast and dinner with meals, ready-to-eat for lunch.

Mission Planning and Execution
The first phase of the operation was the planning phase. This phase began with the initial planning conference at the JTF-N headquarters at Fort Bliss in El Paso, TX. At this conference the platoon commanders identified equipment requirements and developed the necessary bill of materials. As part of the mission analysis, the number of Marines needed for each project was established. With the approval of the 1st CEB and 1st MarDiv, the planning phase concluded with a project back brief to the Commanding General (CG), JTF-N. At the back brief, the platoon commanders met with the CG, JTF-N and key staff to explain what each platoon planned to accomplish.

The second phase of the mission was the actual deployment of the two platoons. Although the platoons had different start dates, they each had an advanced echelon (Advon) consisting of four Marines. These Advons proceeded to JTF-N headquarters to check out their GSA vehicles and all of the JTF-N supply-issued gear. Following this process the Advons proceeded to their worksites to receive delivery of their contracted heavy equipment. Upon delivery, a limited technical inspection was conducted for equipment serviceability; however, all maintenance of the equipment was the responsibility of Hertz.

The third phase was employment. During this phase the platoons were expected to install no less than 1/2 mile of security lighting in Naco and 1/2 mile of antivehicular fencing in Columbus. Both units had the same date of completion, 20 December. At completion of the missions, the fourth and final phase of the missions began.

The fourth phase, redeployment, involved cleaning up each of the jobsites and redeploying the main bodies of both platoons home to Camp Pendleton. The rear parties returned to El Paso to turn in all gear and equipment to JTF-N. By 23 December the rear parties completed their turn-in and returned in time for the holidays.

Mission Summaries
Naco, AZ. The Naco mission, as previously mentioned, focused on the goal of installing no less than 1/2 mile of security lighting along the border of Arizona and Mexico in order to provide better visibility to the USBP. Under the leadership of CWO3 Richard E. Carmichael, 1st CEB utilities officer, and working under the oversight of JTF-N, 30 Marines of various engineer and utility specialties deployed to Naco on 10 November 2005. Upon arrival the Marines were “chomping at the bit” to get started.

The project began with the construction of 31 concrete light pole foundations and 3 transformer pads. This construction equated to pouring over 90 yards of concrete. Each pole had three light fixtures affixed to the top. The lights were 1,000-watt metal halide fixtures operated automatically by photocell switches. After the concrete cured, the Marines began to excavate 1 mile of trench. The training value for the heavy equipment operators was accentuated by the fact that all of the equipment utilized was commercial, most of which they had never operated before. The trench allowed for the installation of over 10,000 feet of primary and secondary cable. The next step in the project was the assembly of the light poles and their installation on the constructed foundations. In total, thirty-one 50-foot light poles were installed. The final element of the project was to install three 15 kva (kilovolt amperes) transformers and emplace the finishing electrical connections. Additionally, there was an opportunity for the Marines to perform a high-voltage splice, something they usually don’t get a chance to do.

Columbus, NM. The Columbus mission, under my leadership as a combat engineer and the battalion’s assistant operations officer, and working under the oversight of JTF-N, deployed 18 Marines on 17 November 2005 to complete no less than 1/2 mile of antivehicular barrier fence along the U.S.-Mexico border. The fence was constructed with tubular steel, concrete, and rebar. The components of the fence tied into each other to make an effective obstacle. The concrete anchored the posts in the ground to provide strength and permanence, while the rails, welded to the posts, afforded the posts additional stability. The end result was a spread-loading of the force of a vehicle hitting a post—like the effect of hitting four posts instead of one. The fence was constructed with four posts per 20-foot rail.

The fence posts were approximately 80 inches tall, with 34 inches placed below ground in concrete. The completed posts were filled with concrete with a 60-inch piece placed inside. The use/effect of rebar was to reinforce the posts to withstand being hit by a vehicle. Each posthole was dug with a 12-inch auger bit and was roughly 36 inches deep to allow for 2 inches of backfill with dirt before pouring the concrete. The aboveground portion of each post was 46 inches with the rails attached at the 36-inch mark. This design put the rails slightly higher than an average truck bumper. This height was determined to provide the greatest damage to the engine of the vehicle.

The projected mission completion time frame was 23 days to emplace the antivehicular fence. By D plus 20 the platoon had installed 1,204 posts, 316 linear feet of rail, and over 120 yards of concrete or 1.2 miles of antivehicular fence along the southern border of New Mexico—far surpassing the initial goal.

Vital Takeaways
The Marines and sailors of 1st CEB did an outstanding job, completed each project days ahead of schedule, and executed each to a higher level of expertise and professionalism than JTF-N expected. Not only will each of these projects have a lasting effect on the Nation’s border security, but also just as important, these missions afforded exceptional training opportunities for cross-training Marines in the many aspects of the combat engineer, heavy equipment, and electrician MOSs. Both missions were excellent representations of what 1st CEB is capable of doing—despite having a large percentage of the battalion operationally deployed. The success of these missions clearly demonstrated how combat engineers consistently do more with less.

Marines pending deployment had one last opportunity to fine-tune their MOS skills/proficiency, and those Marines ending their active service had one last opportunity to utilize their valuable skills for one more critical mission. Perhaps the biggest takeaway of all was the clear reinforcement of the fact that no matter if they are at home or deployed to a faraway land, all Marines are equally vital to the Nation’s GWOT.


>1stLt Junick is currently deployed to Iraq.

 

Copyright © 2008 Marine Corps Association. All rights reserved.